The Internet is filled with rumors, speculation, and wanna-be iPad killers. This week, they all line up and beg for Mac OS Ken’s Ken Ray to cut them down to size. Leaning into this week’s curve ball are reports of iTunes streaming music, the next string of tablets hoping to compete with the iPad, and analysts hanging their hopes on an Amazon tablet.

Don’t Cross the Streams
Apple, earlier this week, released an iTunes beta to developers that included "Scan and Match," the service that scans a users music library, matches it to music it’s already got stored in the cloud, then makes it available for multiple computers and iOS devices for US$25 a year.

All of that is as advertised.

Not advertised was the ability to stream music catalogued via "Scan and Match," though it looked this week as if that was an included feature.

Looks can be deceiving. Streaming was not advertised because iCloud doesn’t do that with "Scan and Match" titles. It just seems to stream music.

Remember talk a while ago of technology that had Apple storing the first few seconds of a song on an iOS device, then downloading the rest while those first few seconds were playing? Yeah they’re using something kind of like that, and we know because Apple said so.

Quoting a piece from AllThingsD :

An Apple spokesperson confirms that any music you want to access from your cloud-based ‘locker’ will still need to be stored on your iPad, or iPhone, or whatever device you’re using to listen to the song.

Further down the page, "Apple says that what looks like a "stream" is really a simultaneous listen and download - users can hear the song while their machine ingests it."

So it’s simultaneously eating my music and pooping it into my ears. Like "Shai Hulud," but different.

While Apple was vague about how it works exactly, it’s really kind of surprising that they said anything at all. I’ve gotta figure there are two reasons: They’ve got enough law suits, and they’ve had their fill of tensions with the music industry.

Stories early on Tuesday pointed out that rumors of music streaming services have floated around for a while now, though, as far as anyone knows, there are no dotted lines with signatures.

So, if Apple can make it seem as if they’re streaming music as far as consumers are concerned, without actually streaming music as far as lawyers are concerned, they win. Though they might want to be public with why it’s not actually streaming before anyone gets any ideas.

Maybe that’s it, though AllThingsD has one exec at a major music label saying Apple actually has streaming rights for music. They’re just more comfortable relying on their technological solution than they are relying on reliable data streams from the cell-co’s of the world.

So maybe it’s that instead. Whatever the case, "Scan and Match" is apparently not streaming any tunes.

I’m Not Dead Yet
Were eulogies for the TouchPad much ado about nothing? Is the device only "mostly dead," as Miracle Max might say?

Yes… and maybe.

First on the TouchPad from Engadget . If you bought the webOS tablet at full price or at the fire sale $99 price, the tablet you have is not necessarily the tablet you’ll always have.

HP says it will issue at least one Over-The-Air update for the device with one rep saying, "HP TouchPad owners can look forward to an over-the-air update that will enhance the platform and add functionality and a growing applications catalog."

Said rep said HP remains "fully committed to the ongoing support and service of customers who purchased webOS devices…" which is funny since they’re far from fully committed to the webOS devices.

Selling devices for next to nothing - really good for sales numbers, by the way, though it can’t be good for the bottom line. HP says it’s seen "huge spikes in activations and between 3-5X downloads of apps," since practically giving the tablet away.

If you regret missing your chance to buy the discontinued device, well, you may not have missed your chance.

Remember when HP thought it might be making TouchPads for a while? Yeah, the company probably bought parts in preparation for that, and a lot of those parts are probably still laying around.

And people liked the TouchPad once it was 99-bucks, so HP says on its blog The Next Bench that it’ll make some more, though just how many more is a mystery. As is when the devices will hit store shelves, just that they’ll be out in the current fiscal quarter, which ends on Halloween.

Devices should go first to people who ordered TouchPads but did not receive them, according to the company. HP says it’ll also try to keep individuals from buying too many of them, to prevent hoarding and price gouging.

So a limited run of TouchPads… and when those are done… heck… maybe they’ll just start making TouchPads again.

In another piece from Electronista : If HP spins-off its Personal Systems Group, rather than selling it to someone else, PSG lead Todd Bradley says they may just bring the TouchPad back from the dead.

Bradley says the tablet field is a "relevant" market, and one into which the (right now) imaginary company could bust back with a webOS device.

Do NOT hold your breath. Electronista says "any resurrection would most likely involve a new or heavily upgraded design. The PSG division making PCs won’t decide on whether to spin out until December and would take months from then to become separate, making it necessary to develop a sequel. It would also presumably need to get a webOS license from its former owner."

I’m sorry, how many stars have to align for this to happen? And follow-up question: will the NEW HP PSG sell the TouchPad 2 for $99? Because that’s what ignited TouchPad sales - costing less than the average smartphone.

Take Two Tablets and Call Me in the Morning
Three new tablets from two manufacturers announced this week, leading me to wonder whether either has watched the tablet space for the past year-and-a-half.

First, Computerworld has Sony introducing a couple of Android Honeycomb-based tablets, one starting at roughly $690, and another staring at $860.

Again… those are starting prices.

The Tablet S is a wedged, single-screen affair that Sony hopes will dent the iPad’s dominance with the availability of music and movies, and the ability to play games compatible with the original PlayStation.

Music? Movies? Games? How will Apple ever compete?

The Tablet P, at least, has something going for it in terms of form factor. According to Computerworld , "The Tablet P is a folding device equipped with dual 5.5-inch screens, which basically makes it look like a Nintendo DS on steroids."

So it makes a small thing look a little bigger. I’m intrigued by the different form factor, though I can’t tell whether the design is actually useful or just a novelty.

I guess someone will find out later this year when the device launches, though I’m not sure how many someones because… did I mention the starting price of 860-dollars?

Sony’s Sony, and you expect their stuff to be pricey. Hitting one straight into the rough… HTC and ATT.

Before I go on, it seems unfair to say the companies are misfiring before the device about which I’m speaking even goes on sale. It’s just that… It’s an Android tablet that’s gonna cost consumers $700 if they sign a two-year data deal with ATT.

This is according to Business Insider . $700 is the subsidized price for the HTC Jetstream with a two year contract.

It’s possible that HTC thinks the Jetstream’s 4G/LTE connectivity makes it worth the big bucks. Thing is, ATT’s 4G network isn’t live yet, and when it goes live it’ll be starting in five cities.

Additionally, the 4G/LTE-enabled Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 for Verizon is subsidized down to $529 and their 4G network is a bit more robust than ATT’s. You know, being live and all.

"If we’ve learned anything this year about what consumers want in a tablet," says Business Insider , "it’s that if it’s not an iPad, it needs to be priced to sell. At $700 the Jetstream is not priced to sell."

Google Amazon’s Tablet Game
And finally this week, last week there was some weird talk from a Lenovo exec about how it would win against Apple in China. He said Chinese consumers would - basically - not be able to

Source